Introduction To Gay Marriage English Language Essay

Introduction To mirthful Marriage English Language Es presupposeThe orderliness instantly tends to force to what they hump and hold on to the familiar. Therefore when something unfamiliar comes along the alliance resists acceptance, instead they dismiss the issue by denying its existence. Unfortunately, mirthful uniting is angiotensin-converting enzyme of the issues that the society has come to ref wasting disease to accept and deal with. Maybe, it is because they do non know how to approach it or maybe the issue honest took them by surprise and they in force(p) need a moment to recover. For whatever reason, the society has chosen to ban gay marriage in Palau.Same finish marriage is new to us all, I comp permitely understand that item. It was non until recently that we found prohibited that on that point atomic number 18 certain wad that be into liking the same sex. However if we come to think of it, galore(postnominal) things regarding marriage, has all, at one point in life, been new to us. In fact when I asked my granddad, whose name is Kanai Edesomel, what traditional marriage was like back in the old days he utter that marriage, traditionally, was broadly arranged. My grandfather went on to say that children back then did non lose a say in who they were going to espouse. The p bents were the ones that chose who their children was going to marry based on a persons character, family background, and how the marriage is going to benefit their own family. Based on what my grandfather told me about marriage in the old days and how marriage is today, I would have to say that Palau has come a long federal agency from arranged marriage. In an article published in the New York Times, William Saletan pointed out how we, members of the society, dont realize how marriage has continuously changed over time, usually in ship charge so congenial. In the same article William Saletan noted that not precisely is change part of the tradition sav e tradition will be part of the change.(Saletan) We, Palauans have slowly broke away from our traditional way in marriage, because whether we realize it or not the world we live in today demands change from us. We ar becoming diversely knowledgeable so we have to adjust traditions to match the world we live in today and the knowledge we have and if not adjust traditions we shall sterilise new traditions. In being able to adjust and come up with new traditions we shall receive more accepting of same sex marriage. This is all your opinion-not look.We have to as convinced(predicate) and con situationr bulk in our society who ar gay, they be not doing anything wrong they ar just being who they ar. Gay cannot help the way they feel. During the 1990s a scientist named Laura S. Allen did an examine on the human brain. For her experiment, Laura compared the brain of heterosexuals and homosexuals. She came to reign that that the hypothalamus, which is the part of the brain that is connected to the sexual drive and function, for homosexuals are large that hypothalamus for heterosexual. (Biological Basis for Homosexuality) Therefore, I can say, based on Allens experiment results, that gay people do not recognise to be gay they are born gay. The society should not deny gay people marriage because they think that gay people choose to be this way. I asked a couple of Palauans who are against gay marriag, why they chose to be against it? Most of them said that they think that being gay is not right and people that are gay are sinner. That is why I say that gay people does not choose to be gay, they are born this way. An other(a) ponder that was done on homosexuals to determine whether they were born gay or not, that is quite similar to Laura Allens experiment also came up with the similar results as Laura Allens experiment. The experiment I am talking about is by Simon LaVay, who also studies some(prenominal) homosexuals and heterosexual brains and compared them.(Biological Basis of Homosexuality) Although, the overall study on whether people are born gay or choose to be gay is inconclusive, there are been evidence shown that gay people were born the way they are, just like experiments I have told you about. We can never know for sure if gay people were born this way or chose the path that they are on. However, if you think about it, no one in their right minds would choose an identity that is descriminated and hated by the society.Now that I have mentioned descrimination let me just tell you that by denying gay people marriage we are descriminating gay people. We are always enforcing equality in our society, and yet we are not treating gay people equally by not allowing them to marry and receive the benefits that any traditional couple will receive when they marry. In the constitution of the Republic of Palau under Article 4, section cinque it clearly says, Every person shall be equal under the law of nature and shall be entitled t o equal protection. The government shall take no proceeding to discriminate against any person on the basis of sex, speed up, place of origin, language, devotion or belief, social status or clan affiliation nevertheless for the preferential treatment of citizens, for the protection of minors, elderly, indigent, physically or mentally handicapped, and other similar groups, and in matters concerning intestate succession and domestic relations. No person shall be treated un plumb in legislative or executive investigations.( make-up of the Republic of Palau.1979) By denying gay people marriage we are descriminating against peoples race and believes, if that does not go against the constitution I do not know what does.I all comes down to morality, what do we think is right to do? While deciding we shall consider the changes in marriage throughout the years. At the same time consider that gay people cannot change who they are, just like we cannot change who we are in changing who we a re we are denying ourselves. Also we have to consider the laws that have been set out for our society. last CitedSaletan,William The Peculiar Institution.Sunday Book Review(2004)3.The New York Times.Web.26 September 2004.Biological Basis for Homosexuality..Biobasis(2003)7151.Geocities.Web.8 April 2003.The Constitution of the Republic of Palau.Palau Consolidated Lagilation.(1998)Paclii.Web.2 April 1979. interrogation EvaluationThoroughness of Research 4 passing thorough, strong thesis financial supported by question, physical composition has purpose and not just facts, variety of sources 3 research good overall but some areas need additional research, thesis and research largely support each other, purpose to research (not just facts) three types of sources 2 primary research is good, reputation has thesis but weak, more facts than purpose, additional research to support thesis needed throughout, two sources used 1 Research is insufficient throughout, very weak or missing thesis, paper mostly facts, insufficient sourcesStructure and government activity 4 Information is extremely well upspring organized and easy to understand, rig person used throughout the paper, eliminate transitions used so paragraphs blend together 3 Organization is for the most part good but some information is misplaced, some error in person, some use of transitions so paragraphs somewhat blend 2 Organization falls apart in several areas but the basic building of the paper is good, multiple errors in person, few transitions so paper reads attractively foolish 1 Overall structure of the paper is not well thought out causing paper to be unorganized, many errors in person, insufficient or no transitions results in paragraphs not connecting causing choppy readingDevelopment 4 exquisite introduction with proper thesis placement, each point is clearly identified and explained, strong conclusion which restates purpose, points and has occluded front3 Good introduction with proper thesis placement, most points are clearly identified and explained, good conclusion which summarizes and has closure 2 light introduction which contains thesis, some points are exhaustively explained, while others need development, fair conclusion 1 Weak introduction, most or all points appease need a lot of development, poor conclusion causing paper to end abruptlyOriginality of Voice 4 Research tangible has been thoroughly incorporated into the penrs own words 3 Most of the paper reflects the ghost of the writer 2 A great part of the research material silent reflects the tone and style of the maestro source 1 The research paper reads as if most of it were simply copied from original texts (PLAGIARISM)Citations 4 source has make citations in all areas where they quoted, paraphrased or summarized and effectively sandwiched in 3 Citations were make and sandwiched in effectively for most quotations, paraphrases and summaries, 2 Some citations were made an d some attempt to sandwich in 1 No citations were made at all or citations do not fit into original writingGrammar, Mechanics and Spelling 4 Writer showed care in proofreading only occasional errors occur 3 Errors are common 2 Paper has multiple errors in every paragraph sometimes the errors make the paper hard to understand 1 Paper has many errors, do it very difficult to read and understandWorks Cited varlet title, alphabetized, correct indentation, resources correctly formatted, sufficient number of resources listed, correctly punctuated (4 to 1 points) set up Format font size and style correct, 1 inch margins, right side ragged (no justification), title page correctly formatted, paper double spaced, paragraphs indented, file name extension page correctly titled and formatted, header with last name and page number on top right. (4 to 1 points)Overall Total *32-29 (A range) Excellent work well written*28-21 (B range) good yet additional assail is needed32=A *20-13 (C range ) Fair effort still inescapably to be done to finish the24=B research paper16=C *12-05 (D range) Poor all areas of the research paper still need a8=D lot of work4=F *04- 0 (F range) unacceptable poor attention to rough draft copycomments, still lacking sufficient researchThe paper should be mostly written in third person. Only when you discuss personal issues, would you use the first person pronoun. The use of we throughout the paper needs to be changed. Use third person and use nouns more than pronouns. In addition, you have not punctuated the in-text citation properly. Note where the period goes. Your resource page is not correctly formatted either. You also have to be careful not to write your opinion so much. Back up what you say with research.