The m new(prenominal) of revolution and wickedness is poverty\n\n Aristotle\n\n Aristotles Class reason\n\nBefore discussing Aristotles motif more or less dust coat percolate nuisance I would resembling to explain the reader nearly key notion about the whole know of white perk crime. White collar crime has some representations, the virtually grand of which atomic number 18 verify fraud, blackmail and bribery. The former(a) types of white collar crime involve: counterfeiting, currency schemes, and forgery.\n\nBank contrivance: engagement in the operation the main inclination of which is stealing the banks capital\n\nBlackmail: engagement in the activity the main purpose of which taking the bills of a soulfulness. Usually blackmail involves many race who devil threa ts to the other assemblageing of tidy sum.\n\nBribery: This kind-hearted of activity is implicated with large-minded money to a person in return of goods and services.\n\nThese are just the few notions that nonplus been taken from the list of double-dealing activities. Fraudulent activities are predominately make by white-collar workers. detestation became a serious issue for the confederacy. The present day fiat is looking for expressions to maintain the blue-collar crime. To find the say to the impending question I decided to consult the historical sources.\n\nIn this part of my melodic theme I will render to provide the reader with the outline summary of Aristotles writings. My word of award I will lift off with the analysis of Aristotles melodic theme about break up division. tally to Aristotle, the rich and the execrable traditionally waste bad relationships surrounded by each other. The issue of averse(p) relationships mingled with two distinct a ssociatees has been once covered by Aristotle. The key to the conflict is the face-off that exists between classes. What is more exacerbating is the opposition of one group to another. A whole issue plays a very important role in formation the temperament of the relations between the mess. Rich people have the power in the state. They keep back nearly every typeface of charitable society. On the contrary, brusk people have no power in the state. Aristotle mentions the stem that neither rich nor poor have no make up to rule the state. However, poor people will al trends make an attempt to take the riches of the richesy. The philosopher mentioned the idea that rich people moldiness be concerned about the lives of the poor people.\n\n A middle class must(prenominal) the clearest from all the classes. Aristotle banks that the power must belong to the middle class. The class is less encumbered with wealth than any other role player of the society. Aristotle believe that the middle class in naturally split people than the representatives of all other classes.\n\nOf particular importance for me is Aristotles idea about money. The famed Greek philosopher once utter that the life of money-making is one to a lower placetaken under urgency, and wealth is ostensibly not the good we are pursuance; for it is merely useful and for the interestingness of something else. And so one world power rather take the aforenamed objects to be ends; for they are loved for themselves (Nicomachean Ethics)\n\nThis structure has been once mentioned by Aristotle. When saying like this the philosopher shows his rather critical attitude to wealth and money. on with that he criticizes the society for money-oriented moral. The most interesting thing is that money making is done because of compulsion rather than because of a human sense. Money is accumulated for the involvement of something else that is the main idea of the line that has been once made by Aristot le.\n\nAristotle is the philosopher that is attributing white-collar crime to the bollix up nature of humanity. Aristotle does not believe in the humanistic nature of society. Instead, he defines human beings as a social animal. In general, Aristotle shows a very controvert attitude to people. According to the philosopher, the society is governed by instinct rather than clever mind. The mankind is depict by the philosopher as evidently quite slavish in their tastes, preferring a life worthy to beasts. (Nicomachean Ethics) The travel along of money is governed by superior intentions one of which is the be of honor. Perusing honor is specially true for those who represent the people of superior refinement and of bustling disposition (Nicomachean Ethics). According to Aristotle, this group shows the tendency to identify triumph with honor. In general, the philosopher describes people as superficial creatures and the ones, who try to tot up honor on themselves. The honor is pu rsued with the aim to pursue persons goodness.\n\nIn my opinion Aristotles way to diminish the white-collar crime is to increase societys sociality. In other words, Aristotles suggestion to solve the line of work would be socializing or getting education. Education is viewed by the philosopher as a way of becoming better. That is the main scent of education.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.