Theory of Justice

According to the legal dictionary (2010) the translation is moderatelyness, moral eighteens, a constitution of law in which every mortal receives their due from the system including all honorables. jurist is comprised of our needs, fair share, fair play, standing(a) and trust. Cicero once SAA the Foundation of Justice is good faith The main surmisal of evaluator Is that It is designed to be fair and an Impartial point of spatial relation that has been adopted Into our reasoning. Basically, the theory of justice guides us to look and study the publications from philosophers like Rails, Locke, and Hobbes.Lockers view on justice was base on the affectionate contract theory. This belief is that free people need to Greer on or so ground rules in order to live together. There are also specific theories dependent on the type of Justice. There is the principle that pertains to a distri saveive style of Justice which basically determines Justice as to what is the fair share. The n there Is restorative Justice. Restorative Justice Is how we react to an activeness that violates what society deems fair play. The principles of Justice need to be fair to those problematic and need to be consistent.This of course is barring any extenuating muckle and if these circumstances exist there needs to be a rattling difference so o other solution can be applied. Perfect wisdom has four parts, biz. , wisdom, the principle of doing things aright Justice, the principle of doing things equally in public and private fortitude, the principle of not flying risk of infection, but meeting it and temperance, the principle of subduing desires and living moderately (Plato). Utilitarianism In order to pick up how the principles of justice and how they differ from utilitarianism we need to know what utilitarianism is.Utilitarianism is the belief that the morally right choice is the only way to cause the most good. The utilitarianism belief may produce good but it also may tram ple the rights of the individuals. So the narrateing goes the good of the galore(postnominal) outweigh the few or the one. So I would sport to say that the mall difference between justice and utilitarianism as we know It would be society has laws that pertain to everyone equally. Utilitarianism has two forms also. manage utilitarianism is defined as a person doing something that will benefit many but they do it without regards to their personal feelings or laws that society has made.Rule Utilitarianism is solely based on the idea hat provides the best outcome. According to Banks (2009) a utilitarian approach to public policy would require that government officials base their actions and programs on ten most accurate Ana telltale International AT special(a) classmates and of the likely results of the alternatives and options available to them (Banks 2009). Justice Defined As stated supra the definition of Justice would be a system of law in which every person receives their due from the system including all rights.However if you asked someone in a criminal Justice agency they most likely would say that it is a system hat consists of the police, the courts and the correctional facilities. They would also say that Justice is what is received for committing a wrong. Today people see Justice as the item that is given out for breaking the law. Security I would have to say the difference between Justice and warrantor is Justice is the system and security is a tool. Security is defined as the freedom from danger or risk. I view security as part of the system. This is because security is becoming more a part of the criminal Justice system.