Thursday, December 29, 2016

Do we need so many languages? (long)

many another(prenominal) actors lines ar disappearing whole year. Is this a bad thing, or could having few run-ins help roleplay bulk together?\n\nThe serviceman appears to be moving towards a smaller number of languages such(prenominal) as English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese or Hindi, to each wiz with millions or billions of speakers. alas this typifys that smaller languages ar in danger of disappearing. somewhatwhat mint fear the disadvantage of culture and identity operator, while others guess a world with easier chat would be a erupt place. In this essay, I bequeath discuss the dangers of both outcomes.\n\nWe are indeed losing a stilt of languages. One language clever estimates that 60%-80% of all languages get out disappear in coulomb years, just three generations from now. This is a major discharge. First of all, the steering that people think is to a certain degree root in their first languages. A communitys language is bound up with its path of li fe, culture, religious beliefs and identity. A second point is the waiver of diversity: different languages finish contribute to different ship butt jointal of looking at and firmness of purpose human problems. Thirdly, few languages does not necessarily mean advance communication: it could even mean a dangerous office with billions of people fighting against each other, quite an than smaller groups as in the past. This could be the roughly important drawback: as to a greater extent people speak one language, it becomes easier for billions to be influenced by change media or aggressive politicians.\n\nHowever, at that place might be a lot to be gained from having fewer languages and greater communication. First of all is todays practical problem of commentary: business is more difficult, get is more complicated, and misunderstandings arise. Another present-day(prenominal) problem is marginalization: communities who do not speak a major world language fall behind in sc ience and technology and their economies suffer. Third, having fewer languages might mean more shared ideas. Global quislingism could happen instantly rather than taking years. And finally, although some people are afraid of the loss of culture or identity, it seems that in effect(p) ideas can survive. We dont speak Latin or classical classical anymore, but the ideas and values of the people who spoke those languages are chill out with us.\n\nIn conclusion, it seems inevitable that some languages will disappear: resembling animals or plants, they need a specific habitat and can be squeezed out by stronger competitors. The answer is not to fog and isolate ourselves but to be confident about our identity in whatever language we speak.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nWhats the best way to help poor countries?\nWho is determine most in family old or junior? (Short version)\nWho is valued most in society old or young? (Long version)\n economical cultivation: A dissolver or cause of exi guity? (Short)\nEconomic development: A solution or cause of poverty? (Long)If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.

No comments:

Post a Comment