Winter Oak - Yuri Nagibin

Winter oak - Yuri Nagibin 1.a) Our gut reaction to Winter Oak is that it had a lot of meaning, exactly was dull and tedious. Some nomenclature and phrases we used to relate our thoughts on the story are as follows: - Boring. - Monotonous. - No real conflict. - No feeling. - No real plot. - Didn?t invoke a strong reaction. - There was a distinct lesson to be learned. 1.

b) Yuri Nagibin used different devices to evoke various reactions in us, some of these were: The dialogue; it was concise yet boring but realistic for example, when Anna Vasilyevna was trying to teach the children their nouns. ?A noun is a spokesperson of speech that denotes an object. In grammar an?? (Nagibin 59). Much of this dialogue is unnecessary; we the ref understands what goes on in the classroom, and two pages are not infallible to establish nouns. Also, through dialogue Anna proved to be a snob. ??Good morning Anna Vasilyevna!? Frolov raised his fur hat above his solid, close-cropped head. ?what are you doing! Put it bac...If you want to get a spacious essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper