Claims against King George III

The Declaration of Independence states grievances towards queen George III as to show justification for the breakup between the colonies and Great Britain. Over half(prenominal) of the Declaration of Independence is a list of discontent towards the dictatorship of King George III. King George III did take away rights of the colonists as yet he was a a lot easier target than Parliament, which was a much more complex system of government. Additionally, Parliament initially disable colonists from settling past the Appalachian Mountains along with the laws to come that would knee joint their rights, such as the Sugar do, the Stamp Act, and the Townshend Acts, followed by the teatime Act.

Thomas Jefferson asserts twenty-seven abuses of King George III?s authoritarian rule. The first twelve grievances state that instead of a representative government King George has established his direct rule. He keeps force in the colonies when there is peace. As well as non enabling the colonies to be able to have a enactment nor a righteous judicial service, seeing as the veritable judges of the time were paid and selected by King George III. The close ten grievances go on to present cases of the colonies inability to ? self-determination?. Their trade was controlled by Britain, which would levy taxes without colonist consent, and trial by jury was revoked. The last five grievances presented in the Declaration be those presenting cases of how the King abandoned the colonies. He waged war against them, turned umteen colonists against each other, did not protect them from the Indians, and used only craze in an attempt to prevent separation.

Most acts passed in the colonies were created by Parliament. The first acts were not created to punish the colonies but just as to rule over them and seeing as they were colonies of the British Empire, Britain was plum unmitigated and emergencyed to benefit as much as possible. The Sugar Act passed in 1764 by Parliament is a good example of this because it was created to repay war debts and caused colonists to have to add-on duties on most exported goods and they did not allow the Colonies to import inappropriate rums and French wines. More acts similar to this were the Currency Act, created to prohibit the notion of legal tender; the Quartering Act passed in 1765 requiring colonists to bear and feed British soldiers; and more including the Declaratory Act, Stamp Act, Townshend Acts, and the tea leaf Act.



After the infamous dumping of the tea during the Boston tea leaf Party, Parliament passed the Coercive Act in March of 1774 or better known as the Intolerable Acts. The Coercive Act was a punishment of the colonies that required reimbursement of the loss of tea and the user interface of Boston was closed until Massachusetts agreed to pay the taxes on the tea.

Most of the grievances and abuses that the Declaration of Independence refers to were those created by Parliament. Furthermore, Parliament began its strict rule over the colonies when developing laws to subdue the Americas in the Mercantilist system. King George III was much easier to attack in an explanation of the separation of the Colonies from the British Empire because in the creation of a impudently government the founding fathers were cautious of monarchial rule and by position the blame on a monarchial power such as King George III, they could avoid such structure in the build of their own government.

Works CitedKennedy, David M., Lizabeth Cohen, and Thomas A. Bailey. The American Pageant A History of the Republic Advanced Placement Edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2006. Print.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper